• Provide a written report. Gainey v. Edington, 24 So. 3d 333, 339 (Miss.
Ct. App.
2009); D.J.L. v. Bolivar Cnty. Dep't of
Human Servs. ex rel. McDaniel,
824 So.
2d 617 (Miss. 2002); P.K.C.G. v. M.K.G.,
793 So. 2d 669 (Miss. Ct. App.
2001).
(GAL properly provided report).
•
Conduct a home study. In re Guardianship
of J.N.T., 910 So. 2d 631
(Miss.
Ct. App. 2005). (GAL properly conducted a home study).
•
Interview the parties with the children.
D.J.L. v. Bolivar Cnty. Dep't of
Human Servs. ex rel. McDaniel, 824 So. 2d 617 (Miss. 2002);
M.J.S.H.S. v.
Yalobusha County Dep’t of Human
Servs. ex rel. McDaniel,
782 So. 2d 737, 740-
42
(Miss. 2001); In re D.K.L., 652 So.2d
at 191.
•
Interview the parties personally. In re
Guardianship of J.N.T., 910 So. 2d
631
(Miss. Ct. App. 2005). (GAL properly conducted a home study).
•
Interview witnesses provided by a party. S.G.
v. D.C., 13 So. 3d
269
(Miss. 2009).
•
Investigate claims by the parties. S.G. v. D.C., 13 So. 3d 269 (Miss.
2009).
The issue on appeal in the case that a colleague of mine is doing consists of how much weight, if any, should the trial court give to a guardian ad litem's opinion when some or none of the above are done? It is sort of like a Daubert on guardian ad litem opinions. I expect the case to set some new standards when it comes down sometime either late this year or early in the spring.
No comments:
Post a Comment