The Tennessee Supreme Court has clarified
that a trial court is required to charge a jury on self-defense only when the
issue has been fairly raised by the proof at trial.
The defendant,
Antonio Benson, was charged with first-degree premeditated murder. The
evidence presented at trial suggested that he and the victim became involved in
a physical altercation, during which the unarmed victim punched the defendant
and caused his nose to bleed. In response, the defendant shot the victim
five times. At trial, the defendant argued that the
jury should be allowed to consider whether he was lawfully defending
himself. The trial court found that nothing in the proof at trial raised
the issue of whether the defendant lawfully used deadly force in defending
himself against a punch in the nose by a petite, unarmed woman. The trial
court, therefore, refused to charge the jury on self-defense. The
defendant was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison.
The Court of
Criminal Appeals reversed, concluding that the trial court erred in not
allowing the jury to decide whether the defendant lawfully defended himself
with the use of deadly force. The Supreme Court granted the State’s
application for permission to appeal to consider the gatekeeping function of a
trial court when assessing whether self-defense has been fairly raised by the
proof and to further evaluate the quantum of proof necessary to require a trial
court to charge a jury on self-defense.
In a unanimous
opinion, the Supreme Court held that the trial court, not the jury, must make
the threshold determination of whether self-defense has been fairly raised by
the proof. The Court determined that the trial court properly exercised
its gatekeeping function in this case and was not required to charge the jury
on the issue of self-defense because the evidence, when viewed in the light
most favorable to the defendant including all reasonable inferences that could
be drawn, did not fairly raise an issue of whether the defendant was lawfully
defending himself when he used deadly force. The Supreme Court reversed
the holding of the Court of Criminal Appeals and reinstated the judgment of the
trial court.
To read the unanimous opinion in State v. Antonio Benson, authored by Justice Roger A. Page, visit the opinions section of TNCourts.gov.
No comments:
Post a Comment