Well,
I finally decided to launch a blog. I
will be focusing on issues of interest in family law and litigation in
Mississippi. I have been working on
several family law appeals recently and noticed an interesting issue in the case
of Tatum v. Tatum, 2011-CV-1795 (decided December 11, 2012).
This
case has some interesting twists if you do much appellate work. In Tatum, the husband appealed an order of the
lower court granting the ex-wife attorney’s fees that she incurred on appeal
plus interest. The Court of Appeals had
previously reversed the trial court’s order and asked the trial court to
determine the amount of attorney’s fees the wife was due from the original divorce
trial. On remand, the chancellor set the
amount of attorney’s fees due to the wife from the original trial and added the
attorney’s fees the wife incurred on appeal along with interest. Mr. Tatum appealed arguing that the chancery
court lacked authority to award attorney’s fees incurred on appeal plus
interest.
Justice
Russell writing the opinion of the Court reversed and rendered on the issue of
interest. The Court noted that the
original remand did not contain an allowance of interest and as such the chancery
court had no authority to award the same.
However, the Court of Appeals noted that because they accessed the “costs”
to Mr. Tatum from the original remand, the trial court had the authority to
access the attorney’s fees incurred by Ms. Tatum on appeal. No motion for rehearing was filed and a
mandate has been issued on this case.
To
me, this looks like a powerful tool on appeal to family law attorneys and
anyone that does appellate work of any kind.
From my reading of the opinion, it appears that if costs are accessed
against you that you are on the hook for the attorney’s fees incurred. I would have been of the opinion as Mr. Tatum
that they were not recoverable.
I believe this case conflicts and/or overrules Harbit v. Harbit 3 So.3d 156 (Miss. App. 2009)which held that the term costs does not include attorney’s fees. At some point, there will have to be some clarification on this issue but until then, this is good information to have when discussing appeals with your clients and potential issues that can arise.
I believe this case conflicts and/or overrules Harbit v. Harbit 3 So.3d 156 (Miss. App. 2009)which held that the term costs does not include attorney’s fees. At some point, there will have to be some clarification on this issue but until then, this is good information to have when discussing appeals with your clients and potential issues that can arise.
How much is a personal injury case worth. A broken leg injury claim can be a complex process in ireland if you want to be assured of receiving a full settlement. Find Out More
ReplyDeleteYou know your projects stand out of the herd. There is something special about them. It seems to me all of them are really brilliant! Michigan Injury Lawyer
ReplyDelete