Separate maintenance is an equitable remedy created in Mississippi. I am working on a brief dealing with the issue now. “[S]eparate maintenance is . . .
court-created equitable relief based upon the marriage relationship and is a
judicial command to the husband to resume cohabitation with his wife, or in
default thereof, to provide suitable maintenance of her until such time as they
may be reconciled to each other.” Forthner v. Forthner, 52 So. 3d 1212, 1219
(¶13) (Miss. Ct. App. 2010). The Mississippi
Supreme Court explained that the jurisdictional basis of a separate-maintenance
decree stems from equitable principles first laid down in Mississippi in Garland
v. Garland, 50 Miss. 694 (1874). The very power of the court to grant
separate maintenance was based upon the following two requirements: (1) a separation
without fault on the part of the wife, and (b) the husband’s willful
abandonment. Stated another way, the
Chancery Court is deprived of jurisdiction to order separate maintenance absent
proof of these two items. To me it is interesting that the two requirements for this are stated as jurisdictional as opposed to an element of proof. With the issue being jurisdictional, this leaves the judgment open to attack on appeal and potentially even collaterally at another proceeding.
No comments:
Post a Comment